<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ~Archive with OmniFocus, or maybe not . . .</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnkendrickonline.com/2010/01/01/archive-with-omnifocus-or-maybe-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnkendrickonline.com/2010/01/01/archive-with-omnifocus-or-maybe-not/</link>
	<description>and Technology Musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 02:03:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kendrick</title>
		<link>http://johnkendrickonline.com/2010/01/01/archive-with-omnifocus-or-maybe-not/#comment-4886</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Kendrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 02:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnkendrickonline.com/?p=1128#comment-4886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Annie,

Well, to be honest I acquiesced to the OF archive.  My concerns early on, were that I would often need to review completed actions, and wanted them with the active project, but then I got a lot busier and just dealing with 20 or so active projects at any one time and all the tasks that go with them left no time to look back at what I had completed.  About a year ago, I just began using the OF archive, and to be honest I haven&#039;t even had to open it up to look for anything in all that time.  I&#039;m sure that there are some that want everything in one place as I was when I created the workaround, but I just don&#039;t see the value of it anymore, and the OF archive routine has been working well for me.  Not sure that helps, but thanks for reading.  John]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Annie,</p>
<p>Well, to be honest I acquiesced to the OF archive.  My concerns early on, were that I would often need to review completed actions, and wanted them with the active project, but then I got a lot busier and just dealing with 20 or so active projects at any one time and all the tasks that go with them left no time to look back at what I had completed.  About a year ago, I just began using the OF archive, and to be honest I haven&#8217;t even had to open it up to look for anything in all that time.  I&#8217;m sure that there are some that want everything in one place as I was when I created the workaround, but I just don&#8217;t see the value of it anymore, and the OF archive routine has been working well for me.  Not sure that helps, but thanks for reading.  John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goddesspoet</title>
		<link>http://johnkendrickonline.com/2010/01/01/archive-with-omnifocus-or-maybe-not/#comment-4884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goddesspoet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnkendrickonline.com/?p=1128#comment-4884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello John,

Impressive. I wonder if you still use this system, or has Omnifocus fixed it by now so that you no longer need to do this? I am new to the program and trying to find a way to keep a record of a whole project. 

Thanks for any help, Annie]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello John,</p>
<p>Impressive. I wonder if you still use this system, or has Omnifocus fixed it by now so that you no longer need to do this? I am new to the program and trying to find a way to keep a record of a whole project. </p>
<p>Thanks for any help, Annie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farmville Cheats</title>
		<link>http://johnkendrickonline.com/2010/01/01/archive-with-omnifocus-or-maybe-not/#comment-884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Farmville Cheats]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnkendrickonline.com/?p=1128#comment-884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m impressed with this site, the contents would be an aid to somany visitor, I will be telling this website. A  thanks a lot]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m impressed with this site, the contents would be an aid to somany visitor, I will be telling this website. A  thanks a lot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Praktische Hilfe für OmniFocus &#171; Macs in Media Archiv</title>
		<link>http://johnkendrickonline.com/2010/01/01/archive-with-omnifocus-or-maybe-not/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; Praktische Hilfe für OmniFocus &#171; Macs in Media Archiv]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 12:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnkendrickonline.com/?p=1128#comment-734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#091;via John Kendrick’s Weblog&#093; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#91;via John Kendrick’s Weblog&#93; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kourosh</title>
		<link>http://johnkendrickonline.com/2010/01/01/archive-with-omnifocus-or-maybe-not/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kourosh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 20:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnkendrickonline.com/?p=1128#comment-733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neat idea! I&#039;ll have to give it a try.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat idea! I&#8217;ll have to give it a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

